Charm 2025 performance review

This is the 2025 year end performance summary of the Charm managed vaults on Katana from 10th July to 20th December 2025. It's the actual performance after incentives for all the vaults' depositors, after accounting for capital losses* and management fees**. The performance was weighted by each depositors' PnL, after accounting for the size and duration of their deposits.

The full performance report is in the attachedarrow-up-right.

The performances and incentives can be independently verified on charm's web apparrow-up-right, and at Merklarrow-up-right.

Performance summary

circle-check

Charm.fiarrow-up-right is one of the most profitable apps on Katana.

In 2025, Charm generated Net Profit of $554,301 (55.55% APY) for LPs over 151 days. This is 4.33x better than Yearnarrow-up-right.

circle-check

Charm.fiarrow-up-right is the most productive liquidity manager on Katana

Charm generated 118x more fees per TVL, and 28x more volume per TVL than Steerarrow-up-right, making it the most productive liquidity manager on Katana.

circle-check

Charm.fiarrow-up-right is the best performing liquidity manager on Katana

Charm generated $311M in trading volume and $130K in LP fees over 151 days — representing 9.34% of Katana’s total DEX volume and 8.41% of its total DEX fees. It generated 5.5x more fees and 34% more volume than Steerarrow-up-right.

chevron-rightPerformance Commentaryhashtag

The vaults' strong performance were driven by their disciplined and transparent approach to earn swap fees, collect incentives, and reduce capital loss. For all vaults, a tight range strategy was used to used to earn fees and collect rewords, and a swapless rebalancing strategy to avoid price impact and paying swap fees. New positions are chosen between 6 hours and 24 hours, so that the vaults can earn yields when the price changes. The variation in performance was due to the amount of incentives offered to the pool by Katanaarrow-up-right, the price volatility in the underlying assets being managed, and the amount of liquidity created by the vault.

Compared to Q3 2025, there were higher capital losses in Q4 2025 due to higher price volatility for all the managed assets. In addition, there were lower incentives emission for WBTC, SOL, POL, and SOL, and BTCK, resulting in lower Net APR in Q4 2025 for all the vaults containing these assets.

Performance Charts

chevron-rightUSDCETH5arrow-up-righthashtag
The 2025 Net APY of USDCETH5arrow-up-right after capital loss, impermanent loss, and management fees
The 2025 performance chart of USDCETH5arrow-up-right, assuming the incentives were accrued linearly.
chevron-rightWBTCUSDC5arrow-up-righthashtag
The 2025 Net APY of WBTCUSDC5arrow-up-right after capital loss, impermanent loss, and management fees
The 2025 performance chart of WBTCUSDC5arrow-up-right, assuming the incentives were accrued linearly.
chevron-rightWBTCETH30arrow-up-righthashtag
The 2025 Net APY of WBTCETH30arrow-up-right after capital loss, impermanent loss, and management fees
The 2025 performance chart of WBTCETH30arrow-up-right, assuming the incentives were accrued linearly.
chevron-rightPOLETH30arrow-up-righthashtag
The 2025 Net APY of POLETH30arrow-up-right after capital loss, impermanent loss, and management fees
The 2025 performance chart of POLETH30arrow-up-right, assuming the incentives were accrued linearly.
chevron-rightSOLETH30arrow-up-righthashtag
he 2025 Net APY of SOLETH30arrow-up-right after capital loss, impermanent loss, and management fees
The 2025 performance chart of SOLETH30arrow-up-right, assuming the incentives were accrued linearly.
chevron-rightAUSDBTCK30arrow-up-righthashtag

The vault was discontinued in Q4 2025 after the AUSD/BTCK incentive campaign ended.

Last updated